IS SEEING BELIEVING, OR IS BELIEVING SEEING?

Is Seeing Believing, or is Believing Seeing?

I heard you say during the call that we are not god-man as yet, and that we are in process of developing into this higher aspiration. You mentioned that what prevents people from seeing the reality and potentialities of their lives are the ever present illusions that society places on our minds which prevents us from believing that we can accomplish anything we set our minds to.

You stated that we need to be objective in our thinking and view our potentials through and/or as objective realities. Therefore I wanted to share two concepts from the FRW Collection pertaining to how we view reality and then go on from there.

(1) FRW: Everyone is born blind into this Earthbound civilization. Thus, like the congenitally blind, everyone becomes so acclimated to this force-controlled, loser anti-civilization that none can see the coming business-controlled, winner Civilization of the Universe… Profound Honesty cures that blindness.

(2) In the 1950s, a group called Quadri-I Research discovered that a small minority of persons thought in whole pictures rather than in segments that subsequently built into whole thoughts. Quadri-I also found that each such person generated nearly the same picture for any given thought or idea. Those pictures were similar because they formed immediately – uncorrupted by biases or agendas. Thus, those pictures were more accurate – more in accord with reality. Arbitrary information and errors had no time to enter the thought process. Such corruptions simply dissipated when the whole picture flashed into consciousness.

So, thinking in pictures (through Neo-Think Concepts) starts with the finalized picture and then breaks down the complete into its segments so that each segment can be understood, developed, and then manifested through creation of the tangible object(ive) outcome. Being born as that which comes from outside of itself (the inner being).

Let’s look at the definition for Objectivity and Objective reality for a better understanding…

OBJECTIVITY:
Objectivity is a central philosophical concept, related to reality and truth, which has been variously defined by sources. Generally, objectivity means the state or quality of being true even outside of a subject’s individual feelings, imaginings, or interpretations. A proposition is generally considered to be objectively true (to have objective truth) when its truth conditions are met and are “mind-independent”—that is, existing freely or independently from a mind (from the thoughts, feelings, ideas, etc. of a sentient subject). In a simpler meaning of the term, objectivity refers to the ability to judge fairly, without bias or external influence.

OBJECTIVE REALITY:
The objective reality is the collection of things that we are sure exist independently of us. Every person is able, in principle, to verify every aspect of the objective reality. Anything that cannot be verified in this way is not part of the objective reality. The tree growing in a neighbor’s yard is part of the objective reality. Its presence can be verified by any person by simply looking at it, or a surveyor determining its position, by taking a photo of it etc. Moreover, the absence of the tree would imply that the tree does not belong to the objective reality (the yard) as it does not exist.

How we define visual objective reality physically is determined through visual recall and visual recall in the human eye is dependent upon the penetration of light variations which define the proportions of what the eye sees. To make a direct comparison with the objective reality, first note that the color of light is related to the light’s wavelength, i.e. the distance between adjacent waves that the light is made of. A device, called a spectroscope, for measuring the wavelength of light in terms of a small fraction of a meter. Such a device is used to establish objectively that a beam of light is red based solely on the measured value of the wavelength. The wavelength value can be checked and verified (or otherwise) by any person. When technicians compare their measurements of the wavelength they are comparing elements of the objective reality and not sensory information of which the eye is one of the physical senses.

It seems as if the Divine (or God-Man) Universal Understanding is not the same in one person as in another; as if, for instance, it were different in the wise and in the simple, or in an old man and in a child. But this is a fallacy arising from appearance; the man is different, but the God-Man in him is not different. Man is a recipient, and the recipient or receptacle is what varies. A wise man is a recipient of Divine love and Divine wisdom more adequately, and therefore more fully, than a simple man; and an old man who is also wise, more than a little child or boy; yet the divine, god-man attribute is the same in the one as in the other. The divine, god-man attribute is the capacity to develop into a fully conscious, sentient being capable of creation.

Newton said that he now knew that what he called the Divine Universal Understanding, which is being itself, fills all things, and that to him the idea of nothing as applied to vacuum is horrible, because that idea is destructive of all things; and he exhorts those who talk with him about vacuum to guard against the idea of nothing, comparing it to a swoon, because in nothing no real activity of mind is possible.

That spiritual light, of which illumines the mind of man, connecting it to Divine Universal Understanding is altogether distinct from natural light. Anyone may know if he observes the thoughts of his mind. For when the mind thinks, it sees its objects in light, and they who think spiritually or sentiently with a higher consciousness see truths, and this at midnight just as well as in the daytime.

For this reason light is predicated of the understanding by its exampling of omnipresence (being in all things), and the understanding is said to declare of something which another says that he sees (that is, understands) that it is so. The understanding, because it is spiritual, cannot thus see by natural light, for natural light does not reside in man, but withdraws with the sun. From this it is obvious that the Divine Universal Understanding enjoys a light different from that of the eye and that this light is from a different origin.

Let everyone beware of thinking that the sun of the spiritual world is God himself. God himself is a man.

When we tap into the higher consciousness that is our inner child, the source essence of all light and life we change our reality into something other than that which is presented to us as real. The blind Anti-civilization that closes his sentient being to its capacity to think in pictures is one that is restrained in darkness.