Hello,I haven’t been up to date with everything on the Neothink Society/TVP news and discussions for some time now.I’m out of touch.I’ve been seeing everything clamping down in the United States very rapidly and how it’s all connecting with Martial Law and foreign troops landing (Russian’s,U.N.) and more foreign troop’s (Chinese) camping out in Mexico,and I’m wondering if anyone know’s about the civil unrest and chaos coming,is it sooner than I think?I know it’s been coming for year’s but is it now just a few week’s away,a couple of year’s maybe?please email me back,thank you.
Tonight–Saturday, I put this on Facebook and an shortened version in the local newspaper.
Today, I read the front page of the Anchorage Daily News—the Syria article.
This is not the norm for me.
My first question is, “When are the Leaders of this United States Of America ever going to ‘GROW-UP’? ATTACK-ATTACK ATTACK—that’s what dogs do—they ‘react’. Why can’t the people, like President Barack Obama and John Kerry just take a long lasting sleeping pill (for 24-hours) and allow the energy to be raised into a higher vibration—like mind energy by those who have the ‘know-how’ to do that.
Ed Dames was once a good leader for that energy.
He probably still is—but I don’t know.
Any ATTACK can kill or maim—and that is negative energy; how on earth would that be solvable by another negative interjected into the situation like another ATTACK??? That to me is asinine-immature-elementary usage of MIND ENERGY!!
Damn, I KNOW physical things can be made POSITIVE VIA THE USE OF THE MIND, for “I ALONE” have changed the activity of TORNADOS and a HURRICANE (This is the FIRST TIME THAT I HAVE REVEALED THIS!).
The questions are
IN REGARD TO ATTACKING SYRIA:
“What is the underlying MOTIVE”?
“What would the USA CONTROLLERS GAIN?”
I don’t know, “Is there OIL PROFITS TO BE GAINED?”
“Do the LEADERS rejoice IN deaths of others?”
“Does any USA Leader INVOLVED really RESPECT LIFE?”
“DO THEY WANT TO KILL MORE PEOPLE?”
Sure, I have read that there are terrible activities committed against some people of Syria, but do we have to ADD TO THAT?
I KNOW, the USA GOVERNMENT has great minds that USE ‘REMOTE INFLUENCING’—AND NOW ‘can’t it be for neutralizing the terrible activities that involve the people of Syria?’
I KNOW IT CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED,
THUS ELIMINATING THE SUPPOSEDLY NEED FOR ATTACK!
JoAnn Cooksey S.