Good evening again. You spoke about doing “The Will of God”. Will our God be omnipotent? Will our God be “O Lord God”? Is there a name to be worthy? Or What?
We are here to live not otherwise to keep advancing bringing all the music from within out for the world to see.Churches paralize our growth in so many way how much suffering it has cause us.I fill so lucky that i can see through this illusions so much clearer of, do the will of god,sacrifice of the soul. Thank you Mark Hamilton for neothink this is a gift you give me with profound honesty and pure love and thanks to Steve & Charlie for bringing us this information in such a colorful way, poring your hearts out with the nitty gritty details.I love your.PEACE
Who was Jesus?
Who was Jesus?
From the treasures of my personal library.
When I was about 19 or 20 years old I read a book called “Jesus the Christ” . It has a many mystical views in it but there is one thing I rescue from my reading. I never refuse a book when it is offered to me. I never know what could be inside that book that maybe will be important to me some how. And I do not discard a book if I think it has something of value to me. This is the case of this book.When I read it, there was something in it that opened my eyes in a very big way. And I want to share that with you. If, you allow me to do so.
There is a big misunderstanding within religious groups about who Jesus really was.
For generations, it was thought that Jesus belonged to a poor family and that being a carpenter was only for the lower class.
Jesus was not poor. Being a carpenter in Jesus times was the equivalent as being a businessman today’s days. Jesus was a wealthy man.
But that is not the only mistake. People have been taught half-truths:
“Jesus had royal blood”.
“Two genealogical records purporting to give the lineage of Jesus are found in the New Testament, one in the first chapter of Matthew, the other in the third chapter of Luke. (…)
Matthew’s account is that of the royal lineage, establishing the order of sequence among the legal successors to the throne of David, while the account given by Luke is personal pedigree, demonstrating descent from David without adherence to the line of legal succession to the throne through primogeniture or nearness of kin. Luke’s record is regarded by many, as the pedigree of Mary, while Matthew’s is accepted as that of Joseph. (…) A personal genealogy of Joseph was essentially that of Mary also, for they were cousins. (…) Jesus, repeatedly addressed as Son of David, never repudiated the title but accepted it as rightly applied to Himself.
In all the persecutions (…) and accusations brought against him, no mention is found of even an insinuation he could not be the king through any ineligibility based on lineage.
Genealogy was assiduously cared for by the Jews before, during and after the time of Christ; …their national history was largely genealogical records; and any possibility of denying Jesus because of unattested descent would have been used to the fullest extent by insistent Pharisee, learned scribe, haughty rabbi, and aristocratic Sadducee.
At the time of Jesus’ birth, Israel was ruled by alien monarchs. The rights of royal Davidic family were unrecognized; and the ruler of the Jews was an appointee of Rome.
Had Judah been a free and independent nation, ruled by her rightful sovereign, Joseph the carpenter would have been her crowned king; and his lawful successor to the throne would have been Jesus of Nazareth”. (James E. Talmage)
Faby Anderson
Mark Escarcega, Hello Dear Friends: (My Comments-Integrations)
Hello friends:
All I can say in my grueling burnt out state is:
Let’s put one foot in front of the other and keep going and work with all America. To build a safe and beautiful world for all of us, under God as it started out to be and as it grew too the Strongest nation on earth for God sake and ours and as it can be the leading Edge for All The World, as it works to become for a most beautiful and safe world for all humanity and civilization, an advancing civilization on earth.
Good night dear friends;
Mark Escarcega
Defining Terms
The word *God* in Anglo-Saxon and Norwegian originals was spelled *god*(say goad). Before Christianity came to those peoples *god* referred to something materially good. When Christianity arrived the variant *God*(short *o*)developed to denote a total, non-material goodness and eventually was applied to the being known as *God.* So two different kinds of *goodness* were thereby represented in those languages.
Tonight
Steve, Charlie tonight you guys put the peg in the hole. I actually felt the love that you God-Men poured upon us. To know that all of the years
that was wasted believeing in a mystical God yes that make me want to cry. Time is at hand to talk to one another an become as one befor we enter the twelve vision world. Yes Pax is a extronary book to read and I believe everyone of us need our own.
Yes I do cry, but when I do cry it will be from the heart. Until neo tech I actually believed there was no reason to cry because peoples did what they wanted and it was all backward all wrong. In thier eyes they saw that they was doing it right but in the sight of the God-Man it was all wrong. With Neo-Tech As of we speak now I am crying, but crying from the heart.
I am thankful for this party.
Mark Thanks bro.
I yearn for this
I want to say thank you for the subjection of getting seven note book.Sometimes i be at work and just have to listen by cell and can write or give a comment.but when i get home i repeat the show and i write down everythin i need.I just want to tell you that every show gets better every day and im very happy and fortunate to be alive in this time and age recieveing this information that i yearn since i was a child.PEACE & LOVE
Thank you Charlie and Round Table
My sincerest thank you to Charlie Moore, Sue Moore(no relation), Kay Samalin, Bill Kyle, Lanny Lambert for stepping in and conducting a dynamic call this Sunday 9/4. I just listened to the recording.
Charlie great job of coordinatoing, orchestrating and moderating the round table, plus overseeing the Q@A’s.
The content, presentation, Q@A’s went off extremely well.
I am very pleased to see how we are all grasping Mark Hamiton’s Prime Literature and taking action to use the tools in the literature, to better our lives…..
Kudos to everyone on the call, presenters and of course you, the attendees.
Thank you all,
Steve Fagan
Hello everyone. Tonight and every night I feel good especially since I have recieve the gift of neo-think. The question who think of the C Of U every day? MY ‘EYEBROW’ raised an I said’ but of course me. I am learning to live in this wonderful world
where we live the life we was ment to live. By my knowing of this new world
befor it happen helps me to have a stronger focus on life an seeing that this N.W.O. prevails.
Until this new world take place I will talk of this new world to come to every one I come into physical contact with, even though we are already in this new world. Posative thinking is the beginning of building anything to last. I am told that I am made for this neo-think life, and with having common cense you can tell when there is a problem, but that don’t stop the progress.
So I really don’t know I felt alone then and I feel alone now, but it is strange though I am still feeling so blissful. I am to believe that it is better to have not than to have it all. then who loose. It make the anticivilization eazier to live.
JUST SOMETHING TO LET GO OF BEFOR I WAKE.
Excellent meeting tonight
Thank you for tonight’s teaching, it was insightful. When I first got my letter from Mark Hamilton, I was not sure why I had been contacted and thought it was a joke. But being the adventurist person that I am, I ordered the book. I did not hear from the society again for months. I thought I had been duped. After doing research on the internet on the society and finding scandalous and negative reports I became really curious and questioned why there was nothing positive reported and I knew something was not right. Usually there are two sides to an argument. I could not make my assessment and complete my investigation on just one side of the argument. I suspected the society was a real organization and the negative reports were there to discourage me. That same week I got my first book. I was so excited, I immediately starting reading the material. The more I read, the more convince I became that the information was life changing and I needed to read it nonjudgmental. I am so glad I did.